Friday, January 14, 2011

The Language of Play

I've started thinking about play from a linguistic stance. How do we use the word play? What does it mean and what does it imply?

This initial investigation will have two parts: observations and analysis, followed by experimentation. I am curious about how the word play is used in schools and classrooms and how it affects students' relationship with it. Beyond that, I would like to experiment with changing, what I predict is a negative relationship between the word, as used in schools, and children.

I'd like to lay some groundwork. The word play has a wide range of definitions, including everything from "a dramatic composition or piece" and "elusive change or movement," to verb forms like, "to engage," "to wager," "to operate." I think my favorite perhaps is "freedom for action, or scope for activity," as in "full play of the mind." That's what I want play to be in my classroom, but here's what it sounds like now...

"Don't play! This is serious!"

"I'm not playing with you!"

"Stop playing! Get focused."

"This is not the time to play."

I stopped a student, who was engaged in unfocused activities during independent work time:

Me: Stop playing.

Student: I wasn't playing!

I run off a laundry list of the things I observed her doing, then closed with:

Me:...Put those on the side play. They're the opposite of work.


Et cetera. Et cetera.

What message am I sending to my students about "play?" It doesn't belong here. This is not a place for play.

* * *
I started this post a few weeks ago as the idea was just presenting itself to me. Since then, I've started trying to write down different phrases and statements that I speak in the classroom involving play. Of course, I've become much more conscious of the word and what I want it to mean to my students, but it hasn't stopped me from using it negatively. Play is something that keeps us from working. It interferes with our collective ability to serve our purpose of learning in school. Every time the word comes out of my mouth, I feel a pang of guilt about the message I'm sending out with it.

I've observed the language of play from my side of the classroom, now I need to observe it from the students' side. I'm interested in knowing how they perceive play in the classroom. Often when I call a student out for playing, they vehemently proclaim "I wasn't playing!" There's an obvious divide here. Is it that everything that I perceive that as unfocused activity is "play," or is there something specific that I'm seeing that leads me to use "play" to address it. I also need to know what the students consider themselves doing in those moments and what they believe "play" or "playing" is in school. After I collect some data in this area, I'll be ready to experiment...

How do I change the state of play in our classroom to reflect that full play of the mind that intrigues and attracts me? How can I use language to begin making that change?

2 comments:

  1. I've been thinking the same thing!

    We have students who are almost given the phrase "plays too much" as a label.

    Yet in the moment when I see one of my students not trying to do the work I've asked her to do, and instead chatting, singing, playing with pencils, I know she's not practicing something important for her to learn, that is just as important, if not as immediately interesting as playing.

    I've usually tried to help teach my kids that there's a time for playing and a time for focused work.

    Two thoughts:
    1. Is is possible to approach serious, focused, work in a playful way? To infuse learning attempts with the feeling of experimentation and with little concern for failure? In other words, can we take some of the pieces of the "play stance" described in Stuart Brown's TEDtalk and mix them into our expectations about how students should approach work?
    2. If your inquiry is going to focus on the word "play" you have to title it "wordplay." :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. P.S. This is Jordan, sorry about the XXXXxxxxXx business...lol.

    ReplyDelete